
Suramya S.
Performance Marketing Specialist
SUMMARY OF EXPERIENCE
β’ Suramya has ~4 years of performance marketing experience spanning Google, Meta, LinkedIn, and TikTok, with the bulk of her hands-on depth in paid social and full-funnel campaign management across B2B SaaS and D2C brands.
β’ At CausalFunnel, she managed over $2M in ad spend across North American markets, growing MQL volume by 125%, reducing CPL by 38%, and lifting lead conversion rates by 65% through multi-channel campaign execution.
β’ She is currently at FXSwede as a Digital Marketing Specialist, owning paid performance and email revenue, where she has cut CPA by 134% and attributed 29% of total company revenue to her Klaviyo automation flows.
π What we loved about them
β’ She was proactive & prepared: Before the interview even started, Suramya had already run keyword research on Semrush to understand the search landscape for Yacht Week. She came in knowing it was a niche space with limited paid search volume, and she used that insight to shape her entire Google strategy around branded capture and category intercept. It was great to see her build context before diving into building campaigns β it tells you a lot about how she approaches a new account.
β’ Logical and measured in her approach: When asked about target CPA for post-launch Google campaigns, she did the math live. She divided the total 50k budget by the 200 booking target to arrive at a blended CPA of around 250 euros per booking, then reasoned that branded search would come in cheaper, around 80 to 120 euros, given the high intent of users already searching for Yacht Week after seeing a Meta ad. It was clean, grounded thinking and she arrived at a defensible number without needing time to think about it.
β’ Has an experimentative mindset: When we walked through a scenario of strong ad performance with low conversions, Suramya's first instinct was to investigate the landing page experience using heatmap tools such as Hotjar or Clarity, and she talked about scroll depth, drop-off points, and friction on the page. She then connected this back to suggesting the client replicate a higher-performing page format and test urgency cues such as limited availability messaging. It was a practical, layered response to a deliberately tricky scenario and she held the thread throughout.
βΉοΈ Things to be aware of
β’ She has a 2-week notice period.
β’ Has hands-on experience with the full performance stack, including GA4, GTM, Hotjar, WhatConverts, HubSpot, Marketo, and Looker Studio, with a track record of building live dashboards and maintaining full-funnel attribution reporting.
πβοΈ Where he may need support
-
Although he lacks extensive experience with LinkedIn and Bing ads, his proficiency in Google ads suggests a high adaptability to new platforms.
π©π» Technical interview performance
Objective
βThis candidate was invited to a 60-minute follow-up interview to assess their technical capabilities in more detail. During this interview, we assessed their critical-thinking skills, technical expertise, and overall conversational skills.
Technical abilities
β’ Google Ads and PPC technical knowledge [8/10]: We think Suramya has a genuinely solid foundation in Google Ads for someone at her level. She came into the session with a clear rationale for her campaign structure, covering branded, category, competitor, and PMax campaigns, and she'd already done keyword research on Semrush beforehand to recognise that Yacht Week sits in a niche, low-volume search category. She handled the brand protection angle well, referencing the need to hold the branded SERP during the Meta and email push, and she flagged the PMax cannibalization risk proactively in her written submission. When pressed on how she'd manage the PMax versus branded impression share dynamic, she gave a sensible answer about pausing PMax temporarily to isolate the impact. She also brought in WhatConverts as a lead validation layer across campaigns, which felt grounded in hands-on experience.
β’ Campaign strategy and full-funnel thinking [8/10]: We feel this is probably Suramya's strongest area. She structured the campaign across two clear phases and within each phase thought carefully about the different audience temperatures she was working with. For prospecting, she leaned on broad interest signals pulled directly from the client data, and for warm audiences she set sensible retargeting windows, 90 days pre-launch and 30 days post-launch, with appropriate exclusions at each stage. The budget weighting toward Meta was reasoned from the audience data, which skews younger and Instagram-heavy, and Google was positioned as a complementary capture mechanism for branded search spillover, which is the right way to think about it for this type of product. She also flagged concerns around the provided creative assets unprompted and was already thinking through what UGC, testimonial, and influencer-style content would look like for this audience. The iFrame tracking issue for booking platforms also came up without being asked, which is a practical, real-world detail that many candidates would miss.
β’ Data interpretation and analytical thinking [7.5/10]: Suramya clearly read the client data document carefully and extracted what mattered. She referenced the ROAS performance by country to prioritise geo-targeting, used the age distribution data to justify the Instagram-first placement strategy, and worked backwards from the total budget and booking target to arrive at a blended CPA figure of around 250 euros per booking. In the interview, when asked to calculate a target CPA for Google specifically, she reasoned through it and landed on a sub-80 euro target for branded terms given the high intent nature of that traffic, which tracked logically with the broader budget math. She also referenced GA4 as a cross-check against Meta's reported numbers, reflecting a healthy skepticism around platform-level attribution. She clearly knows the tools and knows how to and when to use them, but building a more structured point of view on how to reconcile multi-touch versus last-click differences would make her more confident in those client-facing conversations.
β’ Adaptability and problem-solving under pressure [7.5/10]: This was a reasonably pressured interview with consistent follow-up probing, and Suramya held up well across most of it. The scenario question about well-performing ads with low conversions was handled thoughtfully. She worked through the landing page layer first, then scroll depth analysis using Hotjar or Clarity, and then circled back to tightening audience signals if impressions were high and CTR was marginal. When pushed on how to scale retargeting without hurting efficiency, she landed on running separate campaigns targeting the same audiences with different creatives, which avoids budget competition at the ad set level and is a reasonable practical solution.
Areas of growth
β’ When pushed on how she'd validate lead quality against lead cost, or how she'd reconcile discrepancies between Meta, Google, and GA4, her answers stayed at a slightly functional level. She understands tools and knows when to use them, but she hasn't yet developed a structured, explainable framework for how to present those discrepancies clearly to a client and make a recommendation off the back of them.
β’ When faced with a campaign that's underperforming or causing unintended side effects, her first instinct tends to be to pause or reduce significantly β the PMax and branded CPC scenario was a clear example of this. Pausing is sometimes the right call, but in time-sensitive campaigns with limited windows, a more graduated approach, such as reducing budgets incrementally, isolating variables, or shifting audience signals before pulling the plug, often produces better outcomes and gives you more useful data in the process. Building a more deliberate decision tree for these moments would make her optimisation calls more confident and considered.