
Shruti S.
Google Ads Specialist
SUMMARY OF EXPERIENCE
β’ Shruti has spent the last 5+ years in performance marketing roles across three agencies, Social Beat, Brainlabs, and WPP Media, building hands-on experience across Google Ads, Meta, and multi-channel campaign management for both Indian D2C brands and international clients across the US and UK markets.
β’ At Brainlabs, she managed a combined monthly budget of approximately $1.2M USD across accounts including Hilton Hotels and United Parks (SeaWorld), delivering 3.5x conversion growth and a 15% CPL reduction for the US market, whilst at Social Beat she maintained a 15x ROAS for boAt Lifestyle and oversaw a total monthly budget of over five crores across a portfolio spanning healthcare, pharma, and consumer electronics.
β’ Her most recent role at WPP Media involved managing media planning and day-to-day execution for Ford Motors in the UK, though she left after approximately five months having found the remit largely executional with limited scope for strategic contribution, and she is now actively seeking a role where she has full ownership across strategy, execution, and client communication.
π What we loved about them
β’ Her approach to PMAX and Search campaign architecture: Across both the interview and the case study, she demonstrated a clear and consistent ability to think through campaign structure with genuine commercial logic behind each decision, covering SKU segmentation, signal feeding, bidding strategy staging, and audience layering. Her instinct for reading a client brief and translating audience insights into actual campaign decisions, for example, building an entire gifting sub-strategy from a single data point about female buyers, is where we feel she earns her experience level most convincingly.
β’ Honest, self-aware, and direct: During the discovery call, Shruti was candid about the WPP move being a misstep. She acknowledged she should have done more due diligence before joining, explained that the role turned out to be almost entirely executional, raised it with management after three months, and left when it became clear that meaningful change was at least a year away. We appreciated that she didn't dress it up or deflect, and her account of the situation was consistent and self-aware throughout.
β’ Proactively upskilling in the right areas: She mentioned independently learning server-side GTM tracking because she anticipated the deprecation of third-party browser-side tracking and wanted to get ahead of it before it became a client problem. She is also actively using AI tools such as Nano Banana for asset generation and Lovable for landing page iteration, having woven them into her day-to-day workflow in practical ways. Her comment about wanting to include visual mockups in her case study submission if she'd had more time also reflects someone who thinks about the full picture of a campaign beyond the structural mechanics.
βΉοΈ Things to be aware of
β’ She's an immediate joiner.
β’ Limited Looker Studio experience: Her reporting toolset is currently built around manual PowerPoint outputs and Funnel for pacing, while the job description specifically calls out Looker Studio for client-facing dashboards. As she hasn't used it directly, there will be a ramp-up period there. It's not a dealbreaker, but it's worth factoring in and potentially covering in onboarding.
β’ Short tenure at WPP Media: She spent around five months at WPP before leaving, and she's upfront about why β the role turned out to be almost entirely executional, with no strategic autonomy, and she made the call to leave rather than wait it out. She handled this honestly and without deflection during the discovery call, and the context makes the decision understandable.
β’ Her Meta strategy, when pressed, was reasonably structured but noticeably shallower than her Google thinking. She covered ASC, catalogue ads, and manual targeting, but the answers felt more like a framework outline than the kind of lived-in reasoning she demonstrated throughout the Google portion. For a role focused primarily on Google Ads, this is fine.
πβοΈ Where he may need support
-
Although he lacks extensive experience with LinkedIn and Bing ads, his proficiency in Google ads suggests a high adaptability to new platforms.
π©π» Technical interview performance
Objective
βThis candidate was invited to a 60-minute follow-up interview to assess their technical capabilities in more detail. During this interview, we assessed their critical-thinking skills, technical expertise, and overall conversational skills.
Technical abilities
β’ Campaign structure and technical execution [8.5/10]: Shruti's structural thinking is one of her clearer strengths. She laid out a clean, well-reasoned campaign architecture across branded, non-branded, competitor, and accessories search campaigns, keeping each silo genuinely separate and tightly themed at ad group level. Her reasoning for PMAX Feed Only over standard shopping was grounded in practical experience rather than recited best practice. She explained that feed-only suits accounts with existing historical data, and that a well-set tROAS target would naturally orient the algorithm toward retargeting behaviour, which made sense in the context of this specific brief. Her named campaign nomenclature slide was a small but useful detail, reflecting someone who has built account structures from scratch and understands why clean naming conventions matter across multi-campaign accounts. Where the thinking felt slightly less sharp was in explaining the simultaneous feed-only and full-build PMAX setup. She got there eventually, but it took a few beats to organise the answer verbally, and a tighter explanation upfront would have landed better.
β’ Bidding strategy and budget management [9/10]: We feel this is one of the more practically mature areas of Shruti's thinking. Her staged approach to bidding, involving starting on max conversion value, running a campaign for at least 60 days, mapping ROAS trends across 7-day and 14-day windows, and then setting tROAS slightly below the observed average to keep spend stable, reflecting real account management experience. She also articulated well why she'd avoid applying tROAS too early on demand gen, drawing a comparison with Meta's ASC behaviour and underspend patterns when a cap is introduced before the algorithm has enough data. Her budget allocation logic across channels was reasonable and showed she had thought through the role of each campaign type, particularly her reasoning behind keeping Microsoft Bing at 5% and demand gen max clicks at 10%. Her pacing and overspend management approach, using Funnel for automated monitoring alongside manual daily checks, felt like something she has genuinely relied on in live accounts.
β’ Full-funnel thinking and audience strategy [8/10]: Shruti demonstrated a reasonably clear view of how campaigns should work together across the funnel, and we think this is where her agency background has genuinely served her. Her argument for running demand gen max clicks as a top-funnel audience-building mechanism, feeding those signals into PMAX, was well connected and showed she thinks about campaign health over a 3 to 6 month horizon rather than purely on monthly ROAS. She picked up on the 60% female buyer insight early and built it through multiple layers of the strategy, including a dedicated gifting ad group in search, bundle SKUs in the feed, supplemental feed entries around gifting occasions, and separate emotional versus functional messaging in demand gen creatives. Her PMAX full build audience signal stack, covering in-market audiences, GA4 high-intent behavioural signals such as add-to-cart and time-on-site, and female shopper segments, was well-considered for the account context given the constrained budget.
β’ Optimisation and Performance Management [8.5/10]: On the day-to-day operations side, Shruti comes across as someone who treats account hygiene as a non-negotiable. She talked through her search term review cadence with real specificity, favouring daily monitoring with negation applied every three to four days to avoid over-optimising, and she explained the reasoning clearly. Her PMAX feed hygiene approach, involving identifying high-impression but low-click SKUs and improving titles and images before scaling spend, was practical and budget-conscious. She was also candid about demand gen's tendency to stop mid-day or overspend unpredictably, and she flagged proactively that the first seven days would need hourly spend monitoring. Her tracking setup covered primary and secondary conversion events, UTM standardisation, data-driven attribution as default, and funnel-stage KPI mapping across awareness, consideration, and conversion. For the most part, this felt operational and reliable rather than theoretical.
Areas of growth
β’ She would benefit from being able to articulate complex structural decisions more concisely when challenged. The core logic was sound, but the delivery under follow-up questioning was a little circular. Practising structured verbal explanations, for example, leading with the conclusion before the rationale, would make her answers land faster in client or internal review settings.